Ron Burgundy (Will Ferrell), along with his trusty news team Brian (Paul Rudd), Champ (David Koechner) and Brick (Steve Carell), are back and are about to become the face of a new televisual sensation – 24-hour rolling news. However, the course of good news never did run smooth…
Gone are the days when a simple trailer, a couple of posters and maybe a few press interviews would make up the entirety of a film’s marketing campaign. Now it often seems the case that more effort is actually put into the marketing than the film itself. Unfortunately that feels the case with Anchorman 2.
The backdrop of Anchorman 2 is the 1980s but it actually has something to say about the state of news today, and this is where it has more substance than the first film. It makes a comment on the way we are fed news but also how we consume it. Once upon a time, much of what we consider ‘news’ wouldn’t even be entertained in newsrooms, but it’s now become something for that very purpose – to entertain – and that’s the message at the core of Anchorman 2.
But we’ve not come along for that, have we? We’ve come along for the jokes, which unfortunately are a very mixed bag. Now, the film does have some very funny moments, but too often does its jokes labour or miss the mark completely. What we get is jokes recycled from the first film or overplayed so that they no longer become funny. For example, Ron struggling to come to terms with having a black boss is amusing at first, but after the third or fourth instance, the joke gets a bit thin. There’s also an incredibly bizarre 20 minute section involving a lighthouse and a shark which just seems ridiculously out of place and consequently feels unnecessary.
But Anchorman 2 isn’t a disaster by any stretch of the imagination, and for fans there are plenty of laugh-out-loud moments. Brian showcasing his collection of condoms is a particular highlight, whilst Steve Carell’s Brick is still one of the funniest things about the whole film. There are also a couple of interesting new characters, namely Jack Marsden as young and stylish anchor Jack Lime, and Kristen Wiig’s Chani Lastnamé as a love interest for Brick.
Whether Anchorman 2 ever becomes as beloved as the original film remains to be seen, but there’s nothing here to convert those who aren’t already big fans of Ron et al. Even when the film isn’t working, there are still laughs to be had, but just like watching 24-hours news, it can start to feel a little stale all too quickly.
Pros
- Interesting comment on the state of news
- Very funny in places
- Steve Carell’s Brick
Cons
- Not as funny as it needs to be
- Recycled jokes
- Starts to feel a little long by the end
Nice review Chris, pretty much in agreement with you, although I liked the weirdness of that 20 min lighthouse segment. Was glad to see some of the recycled jokes and not so glad to see others.
Thanks Stu. I thought it was a pretty mixed bag. I was in stitches for some of it but some of it just didn’t work for me at all.
I hated the first one and have no real desire to see this, tho be honest, Chris. I will watch it one day, if only to enjoy writing one if those reviews where you can tear into a movie. 😉
I do remember you not being a particular fan of the first one, Mark. I liked the first one but found this one to be patchy. I want you to see this though just so I can see you tear chunks out of it 🙂
Haha! Those types of reviews can be good times, though, can’t they? 😉
Good review Chris. I’m one of the small number of people who wasn’t that crazy about the first Anchorman. I think that’s why I didn’t rush to see part two.
Thanks man. I’ve seen a fair few people who weren’t fans of the first and if that’s the case then I don’t think there’s much here to change your mind to be honest.
Nice review Chris, can’t say I’m mad keen on seeing this though. I think the sands of time have shown Anchorman to be an above average comedy, although nothing more. This, I’m sure will be below average!
Thanks Thomas. If you’re not crazy on the first one then I can’t really seeing this do too much to change it to be honest.
You and I are close again, Chris. I think I gave this a 4/5. I also thought there was a long stretch, about the last 30ish minutes, that just aren’t very funny. I don’t remember long stretches like that in the first one. I also like how this kinda followed the times, where the first confronted the (funny) stereotypes on gender roles, this did the same with the stereotypes on race relations. That scene where the news team first meets their new, black, female boss is HILARIOUS! But, like you said, by the time it gets to the dinner table with Ron meeting her family, it’s a little too much.
Yeah I thought there were too many long stints without any laughs in there, but there was some very funny stuff in there too. I like how it followed the times too though, it was a much more period piece this time I thought.
It did start to feel long towards the end, they could have taken out that whole bit with the shark and I would have been happy. I quite enjoyed the reason that Ron went to live in the lighthouse and the shenanigans that surrounded him there. But I felt a little let down too. Maybe if I’ve seen this one 20 more times and it starts to feel more quotable, I’ll love it more.
Yeah that part with the shark was just completely unnecessary, it added absolutely nothing whatsoever to the film. You’ve got a point there though, about watching it a load more times. I’ll definitely give it another watch at some point and hopefully it’ll make a bigger impression on me.
I totally agree, and made many of the same points in my own review.
Great work!
Thanks man! 🙂
Nice review. I actually enjoyed this more than the first (which I wasn’t fond of). There’s no strong coherence throughout the picture, but there are plenty of laughs and I liked the satire.
Thanks man. Very interesting that you enjoyed this one more, not the same for me unfortunately. I enjoyed the satire too, thought it worked pretty well.
Didn’t love the first Anchorman, so I think I’ll just stay away from this one…Haha. Nice review though, Chris! You taught me something–I did not know Kristen Wiig’s character’s last name was actually Lastname. I’ll admit it: that’s kind of funny.
Thank you! I can;t see you enjoying this one a massive amount if you didn’t like the first one. And I didn’t actually know that was her surname in the film either until I looked it up, pretty sure it’s pronounced differently in the film.
Not as hilarious as the first, but still very funny nonetheless. However, I think chances of another sequel are down the drain by now, especially since this one didn’t necessarily break down any barriers. Good review.
Cheers Dan. Still some very funny moments, no doubt. Just thought they were much fewer and far between than last time. I think a third film will all depend how this one does at the box office to be honest.
Nice review Chris! I must say that I have not seen the first one and I have never really been interested in changing that, either.
Thanks Zoe! I definitely wouldn’t bother with this if you haven’t even seen the first. You might be surprised by the first, although it does tend to split people.
Hmmmmm…. stupid humour or sharper than expected?
It’s pretty stupid in all honesty, but I think it works most of the time in the first film. Comedy is a very divisive thing though.
It really is… well, if I come across it I will check it out. Then at least I will know what people are talking about! 😛
I pretty much agree 100% with you, especially your pros and cons. It was enjoyable enough and may well build some momentum on DVD.
I think it’ll definitely gain a bit of momentum when people watch it a few times and notice some of the stuff they missed first time round.
I enjoyed the first one quite a bit but I wasn’t anticipating this sequel by any means. I might give it a rent though, 3.5/5 isn’t bad and the trailer does look like a hoot!
I think a rental is fair for this one Ruth. There are some really funny parts in it, but it also misses the mark a bit too. If you liked the first one then definitely give this one a go.
Spot on review Chris. I saw this before Xmas and couldn’t really be bothered to review it.
Cheers man. I did debate whether to review it or not but had a bit of spare time so just cracked out a review.
Every review I read lists Steve Carell/Brick as one of the high points, and I totally agree. The movie isn’t exactly all that, but it’s very funny in parts and Steve is in most of them.
Yeah he’s definitely one of the best things about the film. I actually think they overdo it a little with the character but a lot of the good stuff definitely still comes from him.
Great review. Haven’t seen this one yet – have to admit I wasn’t all that taken by the original and the trailer for Anchorman 2 didn’t change my mind. Will probably catch it on demand later in the year.
Thank you! If I’m being honest, if you weren’t a massive fan of the original then I can’t see this one winning you over, but you never know!
Very well written review. I had a different opinion on it, and only laughed a few times. Thought it took things overboard. I do prefer the first! That bizarre shark and lighthouse 20 minutes of horror you mentioned was dreadful…